Apologize
When I checked the literature yesterday, the description of that article confused me about the definition of intervals...
For example, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, According to the definition of that document, this interval is 5, which is the The definition of interval is p-q-1, which obviously does not conform to the definition of interval as qp in this article...
I am so angry...
Then last night I was confused and used this definition directly. Entered, and once again proved that rubbish papers that mess with definitions are harmful to people! Even Internet authors are fooled!
When you read literature in the future, you must look for areas 1. Facts have proved that now areas 2 are beginning to have mixed results!
You guys from the starting point are still awesome, you know everything! I admit my mistake to everyone. I will be more rigorous when coding in the future...
At the same time, I also realized that many papers now work hard on definitions in order to make big news, which I did not expect. Yesterday I thought the idea of this paper was very interesting.
When I am over forty, my thinking is really slow. Although I always want to learn something new, it’s easy to get confused.
My sincerest apology to everyone once again. A bucket of pudding!
(End of this chapter)