Send a single chapter to briefly explain
Both in the comment area and in this chapter, readers are mentioning the number and content of updates. I haven’t published a single chapter in a long time, so I just want to make a few comments.
In April, book updates will probably drop to about 20,000 words per month. The reason has been explained before, mainly due to the author's work and physical problems.
Although we work part-time, it's still my problem. It's normal to get scolded if I don't handle it well.
I'll probably return to the normal number of updates after I've been busy recently.
The second point is content.
I saw that some readers of yesterday's chapter reported that there was a phenomenon of "turning back and forth" in several chapters about version understanding, that is, saying it separately and then saying it together again.
It wasn’t originally written like this. I said in the writer’s words in Chapter 205 that if you are interested, you can go back and read it. If you are not interested, I will just copy the original text here:
[In the previous chapter, some readers had questions about BP. The general point is why ROX banned Troll instead of choosing Olaf.
Why choose the former between Blind Sin and Olaf?
As well as the three issues of VG line rights.
The first two questions have been explained in many previous chapters, but they have not been integrated together.
Including Peanut’s hero pool prefers Blind Sin to Olaf, etc., which have been mentioned in the previous article.
I don’t understand why I still have questions after writing so much. Is it because I didn’t repeat what I wrote before during the BP?
You have already spent money to read the original version, so please read it carefully.
I rarely write useless points when it comes to competition content. They are basically related to the following articles, subtly letting everyone understand the version at that time. 】
To this day, this is still the problem.
Take the previous incident of EZ jungle trap as an example.
The line has been buried for a long time, starting from the group stage. This foreshadowing was not revealed until the subsequent knockout rounds, and the entire time span will be relatively long.
I also said when we played against G2 that the team's top and jungle affinity rate was not high, and the team's preparation time was insufficient after the change of top lane environment, which was very disadvantageous for them and gave VG a breakthrough.
From this, VG formulated a breakthrough strategy for the upper jungle when facing G2, which is equivalent to recycling the previous trap and adding some follow-up reactions. This is the complete plot.
But I explained all the reasons clearly in Chapter 510, and many readers in Chapter 512 said, ‘This thing is boring, it just forces EDG to be in the top eight’.
I was quite puzzled at the time. It was clearly stated in the first two chapters that helping teams in the same LPL region was a trivial matter. It was mainly to hide the fact that the top laner was changing.
It only takes two days, there is no reason to forget it in a blink of an eye!
The author wrote it once, and two days later some readers would ask why. When I saw similar chapters, there were quite a lot of comments and likes. It seemed that I didn’t understand what I wrote, so I would have to mention it again in the next chapter. This made it seem like Cumbersome and cumbersome.
Internet literature is definitely fast food. People mainly enjoy reading it and it has little to do with depth.
But you can’t eat fast food without tasting it, and swallow it down in one glance, right?
There is really no need to spend money...
After a reader raised it yesterday, the author reflected on it and felt that it was a bit putting the cart before the horse, which affected the reading experience of other readers.
In the future, my plan will be the same as before. If there are any foreshadowings or issues related to understanding the version mentioned previously, I will mainly explain the reasons in this chapter and answer the relevant questions in the chapters.
Normally, the content of the article should be as concise as possible - I tried it with the chapter I just published, so that the pace will be faster.
The above is not a waste of money, it’s a serious update!
PS: There are also those shameless plagiarists, that’s pretty much it.
I said it once in October last year at the end of Zhang Shuo, and people had to disgust me in turn.
Since then, I haven’t discussed similar topics in Zhang Shuo or Writer’s Talk.
Lest anyone say I am not hot enough to go around.
At the beginning of this year, I checked this book again and copied three or four chapters of the roaming mid laner. I didn’t mention it at the time, thinking that someone in the reader group would know about it after it was changed.
As a result, there was another weird Feilu before May Day, and others at least changed it a little and did some localization.
You're welcome, did you copy directly from the introduction to the original text?
Be a porter of nature, right?
Well, a writer like me who is not well-known is quite ‘honored’ to receive such treatment.
Stop copying. There are not many books written about alliances, and the goal is too conspicuous.
There are many guys in the group who read all websites. These two cases of plagiarism were discovered by everyone, and I have to sincerely thank them.
Also, MSI signed well today.
Good sign, why is it good sign? (End of chapter)