Chapter 804 Replacing CERN may also be a good choice
When the physics community was discussing whether Professor Fox Hale's research results were falsified or fabricated data.
The BBC Broadcasting Corporation released an interview news message.
"I have always paid attention to Professor Xu Chuan's verification experiments. From a scholar's perspective, this is worthy of support because it can ensure the rigor of our academic studies to the greatest extent."
"In the unified theory of strong electricity, there is no prediction of the breaking effect of quarks, gluons and void fields. This led me to skip this aspect of work when writing the mathematical model, so that the experimental results showed a lack of correlation. ”
"Although the breaking effect of quark clusters, gluons and void fields does not belong to the category of the unified theory of strong electricity, it is crucial to the unified theory of strong electricity. Without this key theory, I am afraid that no one will be able to obtain it. to obtain accurate experimental data.”
"."
Several interviews were published on the BBC's own major media, and were quickly reprinted by other media and spread throughout the world.
On the internationally renowned physics forum PhysicsForums, some scholars who saw the relevant news immediately created a post.
[Professor Fox Haier responded positively to the issue of defects in CERN verification data! 】
【So fast? 】
[Interesting, Professor Fox is putting the blame on Professor Xu Chuan? 】
[If you can’t do it yourself, blame others? 】
[I think there is some truth in what Professor Fox said. Professor Xu Chuan may really be hiding something in this regard. After all, CRHPC and CERN are currently in head-to-head competition, so it is really possible to have some back-ups. 】
[In the absence of a theory of the breaking effects of quark groups, gluons and void fields, it will definitely be difficult to completely detect all traces of the coupling prediction constants of strong electric symmetry breaking. To be honest, Professor Xu Chuan did this a bit unkindly. 】
[But the breaking effect theory of quark clusters, gluons and void fields does not belong to the unified theory of strong electricity. Professor Fox has said so, and it is normal for Professor Xu not to release it. 】
[If this is the case, then there is a high probability that data fraud does not exist, it is just some mistake. 】
[I still stand with Professor Xu Chuan. Even without the breaking effect theory of quarks, gluons and void fields, CERN should not miss this part of the data. Scientific research should be comprehensive, serious and rigorous! 】
【.】
With the release of this interview by the BBC, related discussions have once again heated up on the Internet.
Most of the previous criticism of Professor Fox Hale's possible fraud disappeared after the press conference on this interview.
Some people support Professor Fox and believe that Professor Xu Chuan indeed hid the theory of the breaking effect of quark clusters, gluons and void fields, which caused the CERN institution to fail to capture the complete traces of the collision experiment.
Some people support Professor Xu Chuan and believe that even without the breaking effect theory of quarks, gluons and void fields, CERN and Professor Fox Hale should not let these data go so easily.
Scientific research should be rigorous and serious!
Meanwhile, on the other side.
Star City, in the cafe downstairs of the CRHPC headquarters in Taohualing.
This leisure and entertainment venue located in a small pond near the square is now the first choice for physicists from all over the world to take a break.
Sitting by the floor-to-ceiling glass window, Frank Wilczek held a coffee cup in one hand and his cell phone in the other, looking at a piece of news.
After browsing for a while, he pushed the phone to Edward Witten sitting opposite.
Sensing the movement, Witten glanced at him suspiciously.
Wilzek smiled and said, "Let's take a look."
Witten picked up the phone from the table in surprise and quickly flipped through the news on the phone.
It was the BBC media reporter who interviewed Professor Fox Hale.
Looking at the interview content above, Witten couldn't help but frowned.
"What do you think?"
Opposite, Professor Frank Wilczek took a sip from the coffee cup in his hand and asked with a smile.
"There's nothing interesting to see." Witten was silent for a moment, put the phone on the table and pushed it back.
Although academia is a palace for the pursuit of truth and knowledge, the inside of this palace is actually not much more glamorous than other fields.
There are endless problems such as academic fraud, plagiarism, corrupting academic atmosphere, hindering academic progress, violating scientific spirit and ethics, abandoning scientific experimental data, etc.
As a physicist, he could see the problem behind the interview at a glance.
It was nothing more than that Professor Fox Hale was worried about being accused of academic fraud and blamed Xu Chuan for problems with the experimental data of coupling constants where strong electric symmetry was broken.
In high-energy level collision experiments, the breaking effect theory of quark clusters, gluons and void fields does not affect the entire experiment at all.
Even without this theory, there would be no shortage of relevant data in collision experiments on coupling constants where strong electric symmetry is broken.
Unless the high-luminosity LH-LHC collider did not capture these data, the possibility is really small.
The most powerful thing about CRHPC is the dark matter detector, not these ordinary universal detectors.
In terms of the performance of universal detectors, CERN's universal detector toroidal instrument ATLAS and compact muon coil CMS are actually better than CRHPC's 'large conventional superconducting toroidal field detector' and 'kinetic energy trajectory tracking detector' The performance is even more powerful.
After all, CERN has more than ten years of technology accumulation, which cannot be compared with the emerging CRHPC.
Witten, who has seen the data from both colliders and detectors, knows this very well.
Therefore, it is almost impossible to say that the high-luminosity LH-LHC did not capture the traces of the breaking effects of quark clusters, gluons and void fields.
And strictly speaking, Professor Fox Hale’s interview is not without loopholes.
They only need to look at the original data before the 5sigma confidence level to know this clearly.
However, for the outside world, the general public does not know these things. A 'suitable' reason is enough to explain these things.
But for the academic community, at least for him, even though there was no evidence, he was increasingly certain that Professor Fox's data was falsified.
Across the coffee table, Frank Wilczek sighed and said nothing.
His view was the same as that of Edward Witten.
Fox-Hale's interview can only deceive laymen. For those within the physics community, especially for those of them who are experts in the cutting-edge field, there are flaws everywhere.
But they couldn't expose this kind of thing because there was not enough evidence to prove that Fox Hale had committed fraud.
What worries Wilzek even more is whether CERN was involved in this matter?
You must know that this is the core basis of the unified theory of strong electricity, and the collision experiment was also completed at CERN with the help of the high-brightness LH-LHC.
It is extremely difficult for Professor Fox to bypass CERN and fabricate false data.
But if there is support from CERN, it will be much easier.
This was what worried him most.
If CERN is involved, this is really not good news for the physics community.
After all, over the past decade or so, CERN has been the holy land of physics in the minds of countless physicists.
The same goes for him.
Although he is not a staff member of CERN, he is also a formal researcher of CERN. He has been going there almost every year for more than ten years. He still has feelings for CERN.
After all, people are not like grass and trees, and it takes more than ten years.
Sighing, Frank Wilzek's eyes fell on the Gossip Building not far away.
If CERN is really involved in this kind of fraud, and if he really has to choose one, maybe CRHPC is a good choice to replace CERN?
At least that person is here, and his academic character will not allow such a thing to happen here under any circumstances.
PS: There will be an update in the afternoon, please vote for me.